Amazon S3 vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon S3 and Hetzner Storage Box.
 Amazon S3 The original cloud object storage — industry standard | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (198 reviews) | 4.5 (47 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €3/mo |
| Best for | Applications that need maximum ecosystem integration with every cloud tool — S3 is the universal standard | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Amazon S3 → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
Amazon S3
Pros
- + Industry standard — every tool integrates with S3
- + 11 nines durability
- + Lifecycle policies to Glacier
Cons
- - Egress fees add up significantly
- - Complex pricing model
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.