Skip to content

Amazon S3 vs Cloudflare R2

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon S3 and Cloudflare R2.

Quick Verdict

4.1/5

Amazon S3

0 reviews

4.4/5

Cloudflare R2

0 reviews

Cloudflare R2 is rated higher (4.4 vs 4.1). AWS S3 stores and retrieves unlimited amounts of data via a simple web interface. Built for developers, enterprises, and anyone needing reliable, durable cloud storage with pay-as-you-go pricing. Cloudflare R2 is S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees — ever. $0.015/GB/month storage, no data transfer costs. Tightly integrated with Cloudflare Workers and CDN.

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Scalable object storage for any data size or type

Cloudflare R2

Cloudflare R2

Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network

Overview
Rating4.1 (0 reviews)4.4 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpay-as-you-go (per GB-month + per 1,000 requests + retrieval/transfer)freemium (free tier plus usage-based pricing)
Starting priceFrom $0.023/moFree tier available✓
Best forTeams building on AWS who need durable, API-stable object storage for backups, data lakes, static content and archives — and who value tooling compatibility over the lowest per-GB rateTeams serving media, assets, downloads or backups where egress dominates their current object storage bill — especially those already building on Workers or Pages.
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
39 AWS regions / 123-124 AZs
Global — Cloudflare network
Tags
Tags
free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider
free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
Visit Amazon S3 →Visit Cloudflare R2 →

Amazon S3

Pros

  • + Designed for 11 nines durability with cross-AZ replication by default and strong read-after-write consistency
  • + The S3 API is the industry standard — code written in 2006 still works, and third-party compatibility is everywhere
  • + 23x cost ladder from Standard down to Glacier Deep Archive at $0.00099/GB-month, with lifecycle automation
  • + Deepest storage feature set available: versioning, Object Lock, replication, inventory, event notifications, access management

Cons

  • - Egress at $0.09/GB and per-request pricing produce surprise bills for chatty or restore-heavy workloads
  • - IA and Glacier classes add retrieval fees and latency — the restore path must be priced separately
  • - Policy configuration (bucket policies, IAM, Block Public Access, KMS keys) is complex and historically error-prone
  • - SLA (99.9%/99.0%) is far below the durability figure — availability and durability are different promises
View full Amazon S3review →

Cloudflare R2

Pros

  • + Zero egress fees on all storage classes — no data transfer bill at all
  • + Standing free tier: 10 GB-month storage, 1M Class A and 10M Class B ops monthly
  • + S3-compatible API works with existing SDKs and migration tooling
  • + Published durability (11 nines) and a 99.9% monthly uptime SLA with credits
  • + Binds directly to Workers, Pages and public buckets with no cross-product egress

Cons

  • - S3 feature surface is thinner — no replication topology, simpler lifecycle tooling
  • - Class A operations at $4.50/million make write-heavy workloads pricier than storage-only math
  • - Infrequent Access has a 30-day minimum storage duration and retrieval fees
  • - Real lock-in sits in Workers-based processing around buckets, not the storage itself
  • - Not suited to analytics-style scans or small-object high-churn data
View full Cloudflare R2review →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.