Skip to content

AWS Lambda vs Convex

A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS Lambda and Convex.

Quick Verdict

4.1/5

AWS Lambda

0 reviews

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

AWS Lambda is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). AWS Lambda is the original FaaS service — run code without servers. Supports 15+ runtimes, 1M free requests/month, and integrates deeply with 200+ AWS services. Triggered by S3, DynamoDB, API Gateway, and more. Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

The original serverless functions service

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

Overview
Rating4.1 (0 reviews)✓4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemium (pay per request + GB-second; MicroVMs/Managed Instances metered differently)freemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forAWS developers building event-driven, variable-traffic workloads — webhooks, media processing, scheduled jobs, API backends — who want to stop managing servers entirelyTypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage—1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.95%—
Data-center count—3
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
All 39 AWS regions / 124 AZs
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
Tags
Tags
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
free tierapi access
Visit AWS Lambda →Visit Convex →

AWS Lambda

Pros

  • + Zero idle cost with a free tier that covers small products: 1M requests and 400,000 GB-seconds monthly
  • + Graviton pricing at $0.0000133334 per GB-second undercuts x86 by roughly 20%
  • + Automatic multi-AZ scaling with a 99.95% per-region SLA and no capacity planning
  • + Deep event integration across AWS services, with three form factors (Event/Web Functions, MicroVMs)

Cons

  • - Per-request and GB-second pricing gets expensive against committed compute at steady high utilization
  • - Cold starts — hundreds of milliseconds to seconds depending on runtime — with provisioned concurrency as an extra meter
  • - 15-minute execution limit and payload caps make it wrong for long-running batch work
  • - AWS-specific event plumbing creates real lock-in; distributed event chains are hard to debug
View full AWS Lambdareview →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.