AWS CloudFront vs Imgix
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS CloudFront and Imgix.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
AWS CloudFront
0 reviews
3.7/5
Imgix
0 reviews
AWS CloudFront is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.7). CloudFront is AWS's global CDN with 750+ PoPs and 15 regional edge caches CDN and image processing platform that optimizes, transforms, and delivers images globally. For developers and teams needing dynamic image resizing, format conversion, and fast delivery.
 AWS CloudFront AWS CDN with Lambda@Edge for programmable delivery |  Imgix Real-time image optimization and delivery at scale | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium (pay-as-you-go + flat-rate monthly plans since the pricing redesign) | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $20.83/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested teams needing a CDN deeply integrated with S3, ALB, WAF and Lambda, with a genuine zero-cost tier for small-to-medium traffic | E-commerce, media, and product teams serving high volumes of images who need dynamic resizing and a mature delivery stack without maintaining image-processing infrastructure |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global edge network (price classes 100/200/All) | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | api access |
| Visit AWS CloudFront → | Visit Imgix → | |
AWS CloudFront
Pros
- + Always Free Tier (1 TB transfer, 10M requests, 2M function invocations monthly) covers small sites at zero cost
- + 750+ edge PoPs with 15 regional edge caches — one of the largest delivery networks available
- + Programmable edge: CloudFront Functions and Lambda@Edge with a KeyValueStore for config
- + Native WAF, Shield Standard DDoS protection, free ACM certificates and tight S3/ALB integration
Cons
- - SLA is 99.9% — weaker than AWS's load balancer SLA — and flat-rate Free/Pro plans carry no uptime commitment
- - Two pricing models (pay-as-you-go tiers vs flat-rate plans) with features gated to Business ($200/month) and above
- - Deep configuration surface: cache behavior ordering, TTL semantics and invalidation costs at scale
- - Edge compute and access-control bindings are AWS-specific — hard to migrate to another CDN
Imgix
Pros
- + Own global CDN with 96 points of presence and a published 99.99% uptime figure
- + Fifteen years of image-processing depth — long-tail edge cases are handled well
- + Sources stay in your own storage (S3, GCS, web folders); no asset migration required
- + Clear plan ladder with credit allowances and media/delivery caps spelled out per tier
- + SOC 2 compliant, TLS included, public status page, Enterprise SLAs and SSO
Cons
- - Credit-based metering obscures real per-GB costs and punishes viral traffic twice
- - No free tier — only a 30-day trial; month-to-month costs about 17% more
- - Light on DAM and collaboration features compared with ImageKit and Cloudinary
- - Parallel media and delivery caps force tier jumps when you grow in one dimension
- - URL-parameter adoption creates real switching costs despite portable sources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.