AWS Application Load Balancer vs Vultr Load Balancer
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS Application Load Balancer and Vultr Load Balancer.
Quick Verdict
4.3/5
AWS Application Load Balancer
222 reviews
3.6/5
Vultr Load Balancer
264 reviews
AWS Application Load Balancer is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.6). AWS ALB provides Layer 7 load balancing with host and path-based routing, content-based routing, WebSocket support, and gRPC support. Integrates with ECS, EKS, and Lambda. Vultr Load Balancer distributes traffic across Vultr instances in any of their 32 global locations. SSL termination, health checks, and layer 4/7 support. Per-hour billing.
 AWS Application Load Balancer Layer 7 load balancer with path-based routing | Vultr Load Balancer Managed load balancer across 32 global locations | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (222 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (264 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €10/mo |
| Best for | AWS teams building microservices architecture who need Layer 7 routing with AWS WAF integration | Vultr Cloud users wanting a managed load balancer in their specific regional datacenter |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | hourly billingmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit AWS Application Load Balancer → | Visit Vultr Load Balancer → | |
AWS Application Load Balancer
Pros
- + Path and host-based routing for microservices
- + WAF integration with AWS WAF
- + gRPC and WebSocket native support
Cons
- - AWS complexity
- - Pricing per LCU unit complex to estimate
Vultr Load Balancer
Pros
- + Available in all 32 Vultr global locations
- + SSL termination and health checks
- + Hourly billing
Cons
- - Vultr only
- - Less advanced routing than AWS ALB
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.