AWS Application Load Balancer vs Vultr Load Balancer
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS Application Load Balancer and Vultr Load Balancer.
 AWS Application Load Balancer Layer 7 load balancer with path-based routing | Vultr Load Balancer Managed load balancer across 32 global locations | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (222 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (264 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €10/mo |
| Best for | AWS teams building microservices architecture who need Layer 7 routing with AWS WAF integration | Vultr Cloud users wanting a managed load balancer in their specific regional datacenter |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | hourly billingmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit AWS Application Load Balancer → | Visit Vultr Load Balancer → | |
AWS Application Load Balancer
Pros
- + Path and host-based routing for microservices
- + WAF integration with AWS WAF
- + gRPC and WebSocket native support
Cons
- - AWS complexity
- - Pricing per LCU unit complex to estimate
Vultr Load Balancer
Pros
- + Available in all 32 Vultr global locations
- + SSL termination and health checks
- + Hourly billing
Cons
- - Vultr only
- - Less advanced routing than AWS ALB
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.