AWS Application Load Balancer vs Hetzner Load Balancer
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS Application Load Balancer and Hetzner Load Balancer.
 AWS Application Load Balancer Layer 7 load balancer with path-based routing | Hetzner Load Balancer Managed load balancing with Layer 4/7 support and auto-scaling integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (222 reviews)✓ | 4.0 (47 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €6/mo |
| Best for | AWS teams building microservices architecture who need Layer 7 routing with AWS WAF integration | Teams running applications on Hetzner Cloud who need straightforward, managed load balancing without vendor lock-in concerns. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | managed optioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit AWS Application Load Balancer → | Visit Hetzner Load Balancer → | |
AWS Application Load Balancer
Pros
- + Path and host-based routing for microservices
- + WAF integration with AWS WAF
- + gRPC and WebSocket native support
Cons
- - AWS complexity
- - Pricing per LCU unit complex to estimate
Hetzner Load Balancer
Pros
- + Scale traffic handling without modifying application code
- + Terminate SSL/TLS encryption at the load balancer to reduce backend load
- + Configure round-robin, least connections, or IP-hash distribution algorithms
- + Monitor backend health with customizable check intervals and thresholds
Cons
- - Limited feature parity if comparing advanced options from AWS ELB or Google Cloud Load Balancer
- - Only cost-effective if already using Hetzner Cloud for backend infrastructure
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.