Arq Backup vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Arq Backup and Hetzner Storage Box.
Arq Backup Mac and Windows backup to your own cloud | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (99 reviews) | 4.5 (47 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €50/mo | From €3/mo✓ |
| Best for | Mac and Windows users wanting one-time purchase backup software sending to their own cloud storage | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | encryptedself hosted | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Arq Backup → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
Arq Backup
Pros
- + One-time purchase — no ongoing subscription
- + Backup to any S3/B2/Wasabi destination
- + Strong encryption
Cons
- - Desktop app only — no server backup
- - Destination storage cost is separate
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.