Aptible vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aptible and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Aptible
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Aptible is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.4). Aptible is a compliance-focused PaaS for deploying HIPAA and SOC 2 compliant applications. Automated vulnerability scanning, audit logs, and managed security configurations. Used by 500+ healthcare companies. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Aptible HIPAA-compliant PaaS for healthcare apps | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From $499/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Healthtech and regulated-industry teams that must ship HIPAA-eligible apps quickly and cannot staff a compliance-focused platform engineering function | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.95% | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS regions: 6 shared-stack regions, 14 dedicated-stack regions | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionus datacenterteam featuressso | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Aptible → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Aptible
Pros
- + HIPAA, HITRUST and SOC 2 controls applied by the platform with automated evidence collection
- + Dedicated Stacks give network-level isolation — infrastructure never shared with other customers
- + Managed databases with automatic backups, encryption by default and PostgreSQL point-in-time recovery
- + Fits real workflows: CLI, dashboard, Terraform provider and CI/CD integrations
Cons
- - $499/month base fee before any usage on the Production plan required for HIPAA
- - Metered usage stacks on top of the base fee — containers, databases, endpoints and storage all bill
- - The only published uptime SLA (99.95%) is on Enterprise contracts
- - No bare metal, GPU or object storage — a compliance PaaS, not a general cloud
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.