Akamai vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Akamai and AWS WAF.
 Akamai The original CDN — 340,000 servers globally |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (375 reviews) | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From €500/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Global media companies and enterprises needing the largest and most battle-tested CDN infrastructure | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Akamai → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Akamai
Pros
- + 340,000 servers — unmatched global scale
- + Enterprise security and media delivery
- + Includes Linode cloud compute
Cons
- - Enterprise-only pricing — complex procurement
- - Not for individuals or SMBs
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.