Skip to content

Akamai vs Cloudflare WAF

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Akamai and Cloudflare WAF.

Quick Verdict

4.1/5

Akamai

0 reviews

4.2/5

Cloudflare WAF

0 reviews

Cloudflare WAF is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). Akamai invented the CDN industry in 1998. 340,000+ servers in 130+ countries. Enterprise CDN, edge security, and media delivery at massive scale. Acquired Linode for cloud compute. Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.

Akamai

Akamai

The original CDN — 4,400+ edge PoPs across 130+ countries

Cloudflare WAF

Cloudflare WAF

Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites

Overview
Rating4.1 (0 reviews)4.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forGlobal media and streaming platforms, gaming backends, and attack-prone enterprises that need the largest edge footprint and top-tier DDoS scrubbing under enterprise contractsAny website behind Cloudflare that wants a maintained application firewall and DDoS absorption as a baseline — from hobby projects on the free tier to compliance-bound businesses on Business or Enterprise.
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Tags
Tags
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Akamai →Visit Cloudflare WAF →

Akamai

Pros

  • + Unmatched edge reach: 4,400+ PoPs across 130+ countries and 1,200+ networks
  • + Prolexic DDoS scrubbing is the industry reference: 20+ Tbps dedicated capacity, zero-second mitigation, 100% platform availability SLA
  • + Two decades-plus of delivery track record at the largest media and event scale
  • + Aggressive egress pricing on the Akamai Cloud compute side, inherited from the Linode acquisition
  • + Edge compute (EdgeWorkers, Functions) plus core and distributed compute regions under one network

Cons

  • - No public pricing — quote-based enterprise procurement with real sales-cycle overhead
  • - Not an option for individuals, small businesses, or anyone who wants self-serve onboarding
  • - Dense, modular product catalog that is easy to over-buy or misconfigure
  • - Volume commitments can make traffic overruns expensive
  • - Compute breadth is thin compared with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud
View full Akamaireview →

Cloudflare WAF

Pros

  • + WAF engine and managed ruleset included on every plan, including Free
  • + Unmetered DDoS absorption at the edge on all tiers
  • + Central rules maintenance — no appliances, agents or rule deployments to manage
  • + Attack-score and bot-management layers available as needs grow
  • + Flat plan pricing; no per-request or per-rule metering

Cons

  • - Advanced rate limiting, attack-score rules and full log export are plan-gated
  • - Managed rules can block legitimate traffic; tuning requires a logging-first workflow
  • - Free plan limits request body inspection to 1 MB
  • - Only applies to proxied records — DNS-only traffic is not filtered
  • - A compensating control, not a substitute for fixing application vulnerabilities
View full Cloudflare WAFreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.