Aiven vs SurrealDB
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aiven and SurrealDB.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Aiven
0 reviews
3.6/5
SurrealDB
0 reviews
Aiven is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). Aiven manages a dozen open source data services — PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Cassandra, Valkey, InfluxDB, Grafana, M3, DataHub, Flink — across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud. SurrealDB is a multi-model database that handles relational, document, graph, and full-text queries in a single database. Schema-optional, built-in auth, and real-time subscriptions.
Aiven Managed open source databases — 12 services | SurrealDB Multi-model database with built-in real-time sync and WebSocket support | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams standardizing on open source data services — Postgres plus Kafka plus OpenSearch — who want managed operations, hourly multi-cloud billing, and the option to move between AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud without re-architecting. | Teams building real-time, multi-model applications that would otherwise combine a document database, a search engine and a graph store |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 3 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, OVHcloud regions worldwide; BYOC in own cloud accounts | AWS Ireland (aws-euw1), AWS US East N. Virginia (aws-use1), AWS US West Oregon (aws-usw2) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Aiven → | Visit SurrealDB → | |
Aiven
Pros
- + Broad managed portfolio (Postgres, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Valkey, and more) on one console, API, and Terraform provider
- + True multi-cloud across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud with 100+ regions and plan portability
- + Always-free tier with no card and no expiry, plus $5/month Developer plans on dedicated resources
- + Hourly, all-inclusive billing — VM, network, backups, maintenance, and migrations inside the plan price
- + 99.99% availability SLA with automatic failover on production tiers, plus BYOC for data residency
Cons
- - Production tiers are expensive relative to raw infrastructure (PostgreSQL from $75/month at Startup)
- - High availability, point-in-time recovery, and cloud/region choice are gated to Startup and above
- - Standard support is best-effort email; faster response and phone support are paid add-on tiers
- - Idle environments still bill hourly; free services may be powered off after inactivity
- - Aiven's plan vocabulary and add-ons (PrivateLink, extra storage) are their own abstraction to learn
SurrealDB
Pros
- + One engine for relational, document, graph, time-series and geospatial data, plus full-text and vector search
- + Transparent published rate table with a real free instance (0.25 vCPU, 1 GB memory, 1 GB storage)
- + Hourly billing keeps development and prototype instances cheap
- + Granular permissions at table, document and field level defined in the schema
- + Self-hostable under BSL 1.1 with open-source (Apache 2.0 / MIT) SDKs as an exit path
Cons
- - Young database: 1.0 in 2023 and the storage engine is still being replaced
- - Only three AWS regions (Ireland, N. Virginia, Oregon) — nothing in APAC
- - Smaller ecosystem, tooling and hiring pool than PostgreSQL or MongoDB
- - Scale plan requires a three-node minimum; several advertised features are still marked coming soon
- - Custom SLAs only at Enterprise tier; backup retention policy for free instances is ambiguous in the docs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.