Skip to content

Aiven vs Convex

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aiven and Convex.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Aiven

0 reviews

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

Both Aiven and Convex are equally rated at 4.0/5. Aiven manages a dozen open source data services — PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Cassandra, Valkey, InfluxDB, Grafana, M3, DataHub, Flink — across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud. Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience.

Aiven

Aiven

Managed open source databases — 12 services

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams standardizing on open source data services — Postgres plus Kafka plus OpenSearch — who want managed operations, hourly multi-cloud billing, and the option to move between AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud without re-architecting.TypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage—1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count—3
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, OVHcloud regions worldwide; BYOC in own cloud accounts
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tierapi access
Visit Aiven →Visit Convex →

Aiven

Pros

  • + Broad managed portfolio (Postgres, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Valkey, and more) on one console, API, and Terraform provider
  • + True multi-cloud across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud with 100+ regions and plan portability
  • + Always-free tier with no card and no expiry, plus $5/month Developer plans on dedicated resources
  • + Hourly, all-inclusive billing — VM, network, backups, maintenance, and migrations inside the plan price
  • + 99.99% availability SLA with automatic failover on production tiers, plus BYOC for data residency

Cons

  • - Production tiers are expensive relative to raw infrastructure (PostgreSQL from $75/month at Startup)
  • - High availability, point-in-time recovery, and cloud/region choice are gated to Startup and above
  • - Standard support is best-effort email; faster response and phone support are paid add-on tiers
  • - Idle environments still bill hourly; free services may be powered off after inactivity
  • - Aiven's plan vocabulary and add-ons (PrivateLink, extra storage) are their own abstraction to learn
View full Aivenreview →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.