Aiven vs CockroachDB
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aiven and CockroachDB.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Aiven
0 reviews
4.2/5
CockroachDB
0 reviews
CockroachDB is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Aiven manages a dozen open source data services — PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Cassandra, Valkey, InfluxDB, Grafana, M3, DataHub, Flink — across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud. CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Managed plans: Basic (usage-based, free tier), Standard and Advanced (provisioned), plus BYOC and the new Cockroach Continuum editions.
Aiven Managed open source databases — 12 services | CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams standardizing on open source data services — Postgres plus Kafka plus OpenSearch — who want managed operations, hourly multi-cloud billing, and the option to move between AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud without re-architecting. | Applications where the database must survive region loss without losing transactions — payments, ledgers, identity, multi-region SaaS, global gaming backends — and teams ready for distributed-SQL trade-offs |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, OVHcloud regions worldwide; BYOC in own cloud accounts | AWS, GCP and Azure regions across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific (multi-region clusters) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Aiven → | Visit CockroachDB → | |
Aiven
Pros
- + Broad managed portfolio (Postgres, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Valkey, and more) on one console, API, and Terraform provider
- + True multi-cloud across AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, and OVHcloud with 100+ regions and plan portability
- + Always-free tier with no card and no expiry, plus $5/month Developer plans on dedicated resources
- + Hourly, all-inclusive billing — VM, network, backups, maintenance, and migrations inside the plan price
- + 99.99% availability SLA with automatic failover on production tiers, plus BYOC for data residency
Cons
- - Production tiers are expensive relative to raw infrastructure (PostgreSQL from $75/month at Startup)
- - High availability, point-in-time recovery, and cloud/region choice are gated to Startup and above
- - Standard support is best-effort email; faster response and phone support are paid add-on tiers
- - Idle environments still bill hourly; free services may be powered off after inactivity
- - Aiven's plan vocabulary and add-ons (PrivateLink, extra storage) are their own abstraction to learn
CockroachDB
Pros
- + True multi-region survivability with serializable transactions and Postgres wire compatibility
- + Generous free tier: Basic at $0/month with 50M RUs and 10 GiB free monthly, $400 trial credits, no card required
- + Contractual SLAs: 99.99% availability, up to 99.999% multi-region on Advanced; P1 response targets published
- + Transparent per-component cost documentation and a public pricing calculator
- + Enterprise compliance path (CMEK, PCI DSS, HIPAA) and AWS/GCP/Azure coverage
Cons
- - Production costs climb fast: storage billed at 4.5x durability multiplier, plus backups, CDC and egress
- - September 2026 plan restructure (Cockroach Continuum) splits new and existing customers onto different rate cards
- - Distributed-SQL learning curve: RU model, planner differences from vanilla Postgres, cross-region latency
- - Overkill for single-region applications — managed Postgres is far cheaper for the same job
- - Proprietary managed plane; open-core self-hosting shifts the operational burden back to you
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.