hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting)
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) is rated higher (3.5 vs 2.5). hosting.com, formerly A2 Hosting, offers managed and unmanaged VPS plans and fully managed servers with NVMe storage and LiteSpeed, plus free migration and 24/7 in-house support. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) Managed VPS and servers with NVMe storage and LiteSpeed | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $3.99/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | WordPress, PHP, and cPanel workloads — content sites, stores, and agency client hosting — that want LiteSpeed performance, in-house 24/7 support, and managed VPS options, with the discipline to buy long terms and budget renewals. | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Ann Arbor MI, Phoenix AZ, Amsterdam, Singapore (classic four), expanded to 20+ global locations post-rebrand | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | us datacenter |
| Visit hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) → | Visit HostMonster → | |
hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting)
Pros
- + Strong base hardware everywhere: AMD EPYC CPUs, NVMe SSDs, LiteSpeed with caching, HTTP/3 and Cloudflare Enterprise CDN on WordPress plans
- + Clear managed-versus-unmanaged VPS split with published resource tables and an explicit SLA scope (99.9% power/network)
- + In-house 24/7/365 support (the Guru Crew) plus free migrations and free SSL on all plans
- + Post-rebrand footprint of 20+ global locations across the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
- + Root access, OS choice (Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Debian 12, AlmaLinux 9), and scalable resources on self-managed VPS
Cons
- - Renewals run 2–4x introductory rates across shared and VPS lines
- - Self-managed add-ons are expensive — cPanel from $16.19/mo can exceed the server price on entry plans
- - Bandwidth allowances inconsistently published; some entry unmanaged VPS plans use SATA SSD rather than NVMe
- - Mid-integration after the World Host Group acquisition: branding and support transition reports from users
- - No hourly billing, no free tier, and no GPU or S3-compatible storage products
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.