Wasabi vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Wasabi and rsync.net.
Quick Verdict
4.3/5
Wasabi
240 reviews
4.6/5
rsync.net
343 reviews
rsync.net is rated higher (4.6 vs 4.3). Wasabi charges $6.99/TB/month with zero egress fees and zero API call fees. S3-compatible, US and EU datacenter options, and widely used as backup destination. 90-day minimum storage applies. rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001.
Wasabi No egress fees, no API fees — $6.99/TB | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (240 reviews) | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €7/mo✓ | From €8/mo |
| Best for | Backup storage and archiving where data is written often but read infrequently | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Wasabi → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Wasabi
Pros
- + No egress fees, no API call fees
- + EU and US datacenter options
- + Flat simple pricing
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage — early deletion charged
- - No free tier
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.