Upstash vs Tigris
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Upstash and Tigris.
Upstash Serverless Redis, Kafka, QStash — per-request pricing | Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (105 reviews) | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Serverless and edge function developers needing caching, queuing, and rate limiting without managing Redis | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Upstash → | Visit Tigris → | |
Upstash
Pros
- + Per-request pricing — pay for actual usage
- + REST API works in edge functions
- + Global replication for low latency
Cons
- - Redis limitations on complex queries
- - Not for relational data
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.