tzulo vs ColoCrossing
A detailed comparison to help you choose between tzulo and ColoCrossing.
Quick Verdict
2.7/5
tzulo
0 reviews
3.6/5
ColoCrossing
0 reviews
ColoCrossing is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.7). Tzulo provides dedicated servers and virtual private servers with a focus on competitive pricing and fast deployment. Designed for developers, small businesses, and enterprises needing reliable hosting infrastructure. ColoCrossing provides dedicated servers and colocation services with owned fiber infrastructure. Built for businesses needing high-performance computing, gaming, or content delivery with minimal network hops.
tzulo Affordable dedicated servers with instant provisioning | ColoCrossing Bare metal servers with direct fiber access and low latency routing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.7 (0 reviews) | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $34.95/mo✓ |
| Best for | US colocation buyers and streaming workloads wanting unmetered transit and a small reachable team | Sysadmin-literate teams wanting US or North-Atlantic bare metal at near-VPS prices, plus colocation customers who need 1U-to-cage space with a real backbone. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB✓ |
| Storage | 2,000 GB✓ | 1,000 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 40 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | 3 | 10✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €31.25 | €8.74✓ |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €7.81 | €1.09✓ |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Buffalo, New York City, Dallas, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle, Los Angeles, San Jose, Dublin, Toronto |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterwindows available |
| Visit tzulo → | Visit ColoCrossing → | |
tzulo
Pros
- + Operating since 2003 with its own ASN, IPv4/IPv6 blocks and five tier-1 transit providers
- + Cheap colocation: 1U from $50/mo with remote reboot PDU and no cross-connect fees
- + Month-to-month billing, free setup, free reboots/installs on all dedicated plans
- + Unusually explicit about what it does not offer (no SLA, no backups) — no fine-print surprises
- + Carrier-rich facilities: 30+ carriers in-house in Chicago, 100+ dark fibers in Los Angeles
Cons
- - No SLA of any kind — best-effort service is contractual policy, not a footnote
- - No backups and unmanaged by default: you own your data and your OS
- - Hardware lineup is several generations old (Xeon E3-1270v2, L5630) at mainstream prices
- - Unmetered 1 Gbit is shared with rate-limiting rights reserved; no documented DDoS mitigation
- - Cloud/VPS line sold out; dated site, ticket-only support, no self-serve API
ColoCrossing
Pros
- + Strong hardware-per-dollar: 4 cores, 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD and 40 TB transfer at $34.95/month list price
- + Ten owned or operated data centers across the US plus Dublin and Toronto for location choice
- + 100% network uptime SLA with dual-stack IPv6 network-wide and basic DDoS protection included
- + Transparent per-configuration pricing with published PassMark scores and full IPMI access
- + Colocation from single 1U to full cages with 24/7 operations center and remote hands
Cons
- - Heavy promotional-code churn means renewal pricing can step up well above the deal price
- - Backups, snapshots and managed services are paid add-ons, not included
- - No APAC data center presence
- - Thin public documentation and no modern self-service cloud control panel
- - GPU catalog uses older-generation Tesla/Radeon hardware
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.