Trigger.dev vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Supabase Functions.
Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (377 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript developers building background jobs, scheduled tasks, and event-driven workflows in Node.js apps | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + TypeScript-native with great DX
- + Open-source and self-hostable
- + Long-running task support (no timeout limits)
Cons
- - Developer tool — not for no-code users
- - Newer platform
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.