Trigger.dev vs Inngest
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Inngest.
Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (377 reviews) | 4.9 (360 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript developers building background jobs, scheduled tasks, and event-driven workflows in Node.js apps | Full-stack developers adding reliable background jobs and event-driven workflows to their Next.js or Node apps |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Inngest → | |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + TypeScript-native with great DX
- + Open-source and self-hostable
- + Long-running task support (no timeout limits)
Cons
- - Developer tool — not for no-code users
- - Newer platform
Inngest
Pros
- + Zero infrastructure setup
- + Automatic retries with backoff
- + Works with any framework or language
Cons
- - Usage-based pricing at scale
- - Developer tool only
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.