Tigris vs Fauna
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tigris and Fauna.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Tigris
108 reviews
3.8/5
Fauna
339 reviews
Tigris is rated higher (4.8 vs 3.8). Tigris is a serverless NoSQL database with built-in search and S3-compatible object storage. Global distribution, no connection pools needed, and developer-first design. Used on Fly.io. Fauna is a serverless document database with ACID transactions, native GraphQL API, and global replication. No servers to manage. Unique multi-tenancy model. Ideal for Jamstack and serverless apps.
Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | Fauna Serverless document database with ACID transactions | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (339 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform | Jamstack developers who need a serverless database with GraphQL API and automatic global replication |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Tigris → | Visit Fauna → | |
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
Fauna
Pros
- + Serverless — no scaling needed
- + GraphQL API native
- + ACID transactions across global regions
Cons
- - Proprietary FQL query language
- - Pricing can surprise at scale
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.