Supabase vs Supabase Functions

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Supabase Functions.

Supabase

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL

Supabase Functions

Supabase Functions

Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data

Overview
Rating4.0 (92 reviews)4.5 (372 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams building web/mobile apps who prefer PostgreSQL's relational model and want to avoid vendor lock-in.Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count12
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanySingaporeAustralia
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source
free tierapi access
Visit Supabase →Visit Supabase Functions →

Supabase

Pros

  • + Use standard PostgreSQL with full SQL support
  • + Self-host or run on managed infrastructure
  • + Real-time subscriptions with minimal latency
  • + Built-in authentication and row-level security
  • + Free tier sufficient for prototyping

Cons

  • - Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Firebase
  • - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
  • - Scaling to high concurrency requires manual tuning
View full Supabasereview →

Supabase Functions

Pros

  • + Low latency access to Supabase DB
  • + 500K free invocations/month
  • + Deno TypeScript native

Cons

  • - Deno differences from Node.js
  • - Supabase ecosystem dependency
View full Supabase Functionsreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.