Supabase vs Inngest
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Inngest.
Supabase Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL | Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (92 reviews) | 4.9 (360 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams building web/mobile apps who prefer PostgreSQL's relational model and want to avoid vendor lock-in. | Full-stack developers adding reliable background jobs and event-driven workflows to their Next.js or Node apps |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 12 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanySingaporeAustralia | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Supabase → | Visit Inngest → | |
Supabase
Pros
- + Use standard PostgreSQL with full SQL support
- + Self-host or run on managed infrastructure
- + Real-time subscriptions with minimal latency
- + Built-in authentication and row-level security
- + Free tier sufficient for prototyping
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Firebase
- - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
- - Scaling to high concurrency requires manual tuning
Inngest
Pros
- + Zero infrastructure setup
- + Automatic retries with backoff
- + Works with any framework or language
Cons
- - Usage-based pricing at scale
- - Developer tool only
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.