Supabase vs Deno Deploy

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Deno Deploy.

Supabase

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL

Deno Deploy

Deno Deploy

Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally

Overview
Rating4.0 (92 reviews)4.6 (70 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams building web/mobile apps who prefer PostgreSQL's relational model and want to avoid vendor lock-in.TypeScript developers who want edge computing with Deno's security model and zero cold starts
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count12
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanySingaporeAustralia
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source
free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
Visit Supabase →Visit Deno Deploy →

Supabase

Pros

  • + Use standard PostgreSQL with full SQL support
  • + Self-host or run on managed infrastructure
  • + Real-time subscriptions with minimal latency
  • + Built-in authentication and row-level security
  • + Free tier sufficient for prototyping

Cons

  • - Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Firebase
  • - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
  • - Scaling to high concurrency requires manual tuning
View full Supabasereview →

Deno Deploy

Pros

  • + Zero cold starts
  • + Deno security model — no file/network access by default
  • + TypeScript native

Cons

  • - Deno runtime — not Node.js compatible
  • - Newer ecosystem
View full Deno Deployreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.