Supabase Functions vs Inngest
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase Functions and Inngest.
Quick Verdict
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
4.9/5
Inngest
360 reviews
Inngest is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.5). Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month. Inngest is a developer platform for building reliable event-driven background functions. Automatic retries, delays, fan-out, and step functions. Works with Next.js, Node.js, Go, and Python.
Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (372 reviews) | 4.9 (360 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database | Full-stack developers adding reliable background jobs and event-driven workflows to their Next.js or Node apps |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Supabase Functions → | Visit Inngest → | |
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Inngest
Pros
- + Zero infrastructure setup
- + Automatic retries with backoff
- + Works with any framework or language
Cons
- - Usage-based pricing at scale
- - Developer tool only
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.