Supabase Functions vs Encore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase Functions and Encore.
Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | Encore TypeScript backend framework with built-in infra | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (253 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database | TypeScript developers who want infrastructure automatically provisioned from their application code |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Supabase Functions → | Visit Encore → | |
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Encore
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code — no Terraform
- + Automatic local dev environment
- + Open source framework
Cons
- - Encore-specific patterns to learn
- - Less flexible than raw Terraform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.