Supabase Functions vs Deno Deploy
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase Functions and Deno Deploy.
Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (372 reviews) | 4.6 (70 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database | TypeScript developers who want edge computing with Deno's security model and zero cold starts |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Supabase Functions → | Visit Deno Deploy → | |
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + Zero cold starts
- + Deno security model — no file/network access by default
- + TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno runtime — not Node.js compatible
- - Newer ecosystem
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.