StackPath vs Path.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between StackPath and Path.net.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
StackPath
93 reviews
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
StackPath is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.6). StackPath provides CDN, WAF, DDoS protection, and edge compute with 50+ PoPs globally. Simple pricing model and strong integration with serverless edge workers. Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation.
StackPath CDN and edge compute platform | Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (93 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (278 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €300/mo |
| Best for | Developers wanting CDN, WAF, and edge compute in one platform at predictable pricing | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit StackPath → | Visit Path.net → | |
StackPath
Pros
- + CDN + WAF + DDoS + edge compute combined
- + Simple flat-rate pricing
- + 50+ global PoPs
Cons
- - Smaller network than Cloudflare
- - Less ecosystem integration
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.