Shock Hosting vs Vultr Bare Metal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Shock Hosting and Vultr Bare Metal.
Shock Hosting High-performance dedicated servers in US East | Vultr Bare Metal On-demand bare metal across 32 global locations | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (147 reviews) | 5.0 (84 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €40/mo✓ | From €120/mo |
| Best for | US East Coast applications wanting high-performance AMD EPYC dedicated servers with NVMe | Developers and businesses needing on-demand bare metal in specific global locations on Vultr's network |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterwindows available | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Shock Hosting → | Visit Vultr Bare Metal → | |
Shock Hosting
Pros
- + AMD EPYC options for compute performance
- + NVMe storage standard
- + US East Coast focus for latency
Cons
- - US East only
- - Smaller provider
Vultr Bare Metal
Pros
- + 32 global locations — most for bare metal
- + Hourly billing available
- + Vultr ecosystem integration
Cons
- - More expensive than Hetzner dedicated
- - No custom hardware
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.