rsync.net vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
4.6/5
rsync.net
343 reviews
4.3/5
Wasabi
240 reviews
rsync.net is rated higher (4.6 vs 4.3). rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. Wasabi charges $6.99/TB/month with zero egress fees and zero API call fees. S3-compatible, US and EU datacenter options, and widely used as backup destination. 90-day minimum storage applies.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Wasabi No egress fees, no API fees — $6.99/TB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (240 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €8/mo | From €7/mo✓ |
| Best for | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider | Backup storage and archiving where data is written often but read infrequently |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Wasabi → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Wasabi
Pros
- + No egress fees, no API call fees
- + EU and US datacenter options
- + Flat simple pricing
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage — early deletion charged
- - No free tier
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.