rsync.net vs CrashPlan
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and CrashPlan.
Quick Verdict
4.6/5
rsync.net
343 reviews
3.6/5
CrashPlan
366 reviews
rsync.net is rated higher (4.6 vs 3.6). rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. CrashPlan provides unlimited endpoint backup for businesses. Deploy to employee laptops and workstations centrally. No file size limits, unlimited versioning, and forensic restore capabilities.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | CrashPlan Unlimited endpoint backup for businesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (366 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €8/mo✓ | From €10/mo |
| Best for | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider | IT departments needing centrally managed unlimited endpoint backup for employee laptops |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | team features |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit CrashPlan → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
CrashPlan
Pros
- + Unlimited storage per endpoint
- + Central deployment for enterprise
- + Unlimited version history
Cons
- - Expensive for individuals — business focus
- - No personal plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.