rsync.net vs Backblaze B2
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Backblaze B2.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
rsync.net
0 reviews
4.2/5
Backblaze B2
0 reviews
Backblaze B2 is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. Backblaze B2 offers S3-compatible object storage at $6.95/TB/month (raised from $6/TB in May). Free egress up to 3x stored data for all customers, unlimited free egress to partner CDNs/compute.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Backblaze B2 S3-compatible object storage at $6.95/TB/month with 3x free egress | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $12/mo | From $6.95/mo✓ |
| Best for | Sysadmins who want SSH-native off-site backup storage with immutable snapshots, honest per-GB pricing, and humans on the support line. | Backup targets, snapshot archives, and asset storage where low, predictable cost beats global distribution |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Fremont, CA; Denver, CO; Zurich, Switzerland; Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong | ["US West (Sacramento, Stockton, Phoenix)", "US East (Reston, VA)", "EU Central (Amsterdam, NL)", "CA East (Toronto, ON)"] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Backblaze B2 → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + Plain SSH-reachable UNIX filesystem: works with rsync, Borg, Restic, rclone, git-annex
- + Immutable ZFS snapshots on every standard account — strong ransomware protection
- + No egress charges, no contracts, and per-GB pricing that falls with volume
- + Own infrastructure in four locations (Fremont, Denver, Zurich, Hong Kong) with free account migration
- + Unlimited email and phone support from real engineers at every account size
Cons
- - No web UI — account management is email-based and the product is command-line only
- - 800 GB minimum on standard accounts; no free tier
- - Per-terabyte cost is higher than B2-class object storage for cold archives
- - No contractual uptime SLA published (resiliency claims are statistics, not commitments)
- - Bring your own backup tool, scheduling, and monitoring
Backblaze B2
Pros
- + $6.95/TB/month storage with no minimum file size or storage duration fees
- + Free egress up to 3x average monthly storage for all customers; unlimited free egress to partner CDNs/compute
- + Genuine S3-compatible API plus native API, with free Class A/B/C transactions
- + 11 nines claimed durability with published Vault math (20 shards across 20 pods)
- + EU data residency via the Amsterdam region; permanent 10 GB free tier
Cons
- - One region per account (fixed at creation); no cross-region buckets or read replicas
- - S3 compatibility is partial: no IAM roles, object tagging, or website hosting; bucket-level ACLs only
- - SLA is thin: 99.9% objective with 5–10% service credits
- - Storage price rose from $6 to $6.95/TB in May — value still strong, but the direction is upward
- - No compute, functions, or database services
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.