rsync.net vs Backblaze B2
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Backblaze B2.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Backblaze B2 S3-compatible storage at a quarter of AWS S3 pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (110 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From €8/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider | Developers and startups who need S3-compatible storage at the lowest possible price and don't require EU data residency |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Backblaze B2 → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Backblaze B2
Pros
- + $6/TB/month — significantly cheaper than AWS S3
- + Free egress when paired with Cloudflare
- + S3-compatible API — drop-in replacement
Cons
- - US-only datacenters — no EU data residency option
- - No EU-based storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.