Restic vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Restic and rsync.net.
Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (40 reviews)✓ | 4.6 (343 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €8/mo |
| Best for | Developers and sysadmins wanting a flexible, encrypted backup tool that can target any storage backend | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Restic → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Restic
Pros
- + Backs up to any storage backend — S3, B2, GCS, SFTP
- + Strong AES-256 encryption
- + No server — single binary
Cons
- - Command-line only
- - Repository management can be complex
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.