Quay.io vs Google Artifact Registry
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Quay.io and Google Artifact Registry.
Quick Verdict
4.5/5
Quay.io
312 reviews
3.6/5
Google Artifact Registry
299 reviews
Quay.io is rated higher (4.5 vs 3.6). Quay.io is an enterprise container registry from Red Hat (IBM). Security scanning, robot accounts, teams, and organizations. Used by large enterprises needing audit logging. Google Artifact Registry stores Docker container images, Helm charts, npm, Maven, and Python packages in one place. Vulnerability scanning built-in. Integrates with Cloud Build and GKE.
Quay.io Enterprise container registry from Red Hat | Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (312 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (299 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprise teams using Red Hat/OpenShift who need enterprise security scanning and audit logging for containers | GCP-invested teams wanting a universal package and container registry with built-in vulnerability scanning |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssoapi access | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Quay.io → | Visit Google Artifact Registry → | |
Quay.io
Pros
- + Enterprise security scanning for CVEs
- + Robot accounts for CI/CD automation
- + Red Hat support and trust
Cons
- - Red Hat pricing model can be complex
- - Less developer-friendly than Docker Hub for individuals
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + Multi-format: Docker, Helm, npm, Maven, Python
- + Vulnerability scanning built-in
- + Deep GKE and Cloud Build integration
Cons
- - GCP ecosystem required
- - Pricing per GB storage and egress
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.