Porter vs Scaleway
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Porter and Scaleway.
Porter Kubernetes deployments for teams without DevOps | Scaleway European cloud infrastructure with competitive pricing and transparent billing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (52 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (475 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Growing engineering teams who need Kubernetes scalability but don't have dedicated DevOps resources | European startups and developers prioritizing cost efficiency, data sovereignty, and avoiding long-term contracts with established cloud providers. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 20 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 5 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | FranceNetherlandsPoland |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionteam featureskubernetes supportapi access | free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionsnapshotsmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacentergdpr compliantterraform providerkubernetes supportapi access |
| Visit Porter → | Visit Scaleway → | |
Porter
Pros
- + Kubernetes power with Heroku simplicity
- + PR preview environments
- + Your own cloud account — data stays with you
Cons
- - Requires AWS/GCP/DO account
- - More setup than Render or Railway
Scaleway
Pros
- + Configure instances precisely with granular CPU, RAM, and storage options
- + Access bare-metal servers at lower price points than major competitors
- + Pay by the hour with no long-term contracts or setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via API or intuitive dashboard
- + Comply with EU data residency requirements with multiple European regions
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support response times slower than premium enterprise providers
- - Limited US region availability; primarily Europe-focused infrastructure
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.