Porter vs Heroku
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Porter and Heroku.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Porter
52 reviews
4.3/5
Heroku
393 reviews
Porter is rated higher (4.8 vs 4.3). Porter is a managed deployment platform on top of Kubernetes. Provision a GKE, EKS, or DOKS cluster and get Heroku-like deployments with PR previews, autoscaling, and GitHub Actions integration. Heroku pioneered platform-as-a-service in 2007. Owned by Salesforce. Supports 10+ languages, huge addon marketplace (150+ addons). Removed free tier in 2022 but remains popular for ease of use. Eco plans restart.
Porter Kubernetes deployments for teams without DevOps | Heroku The original PaaS — still the easiest deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (52 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (393 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €5/mo |
| Best for | Growing engineering teams who need Kubernetes scalability but don't have dedicated DevOps resources | Developers who prioritize the largest addon ecosystem and a proven, mature PaaS with minimal configuration |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionteam featureskubernetes supportapi access | managed optionus datacentereu datacenterapi access |
| Visit Porter → | Visit Heroku → | |
Porter
Pros
- + Kubernetes power with Heroku simplicity
- + PR preview environments
- + Your own cloud account — data stays with you
Cons
- - Requires AWS/GCP/DO account
- - More setup than Render or Railway
Heroku
Pros
- + Most addon marketplace options — 150+
- + Dead-simple deployments with git push
- + Longest PaaS track record
Cons
- - Removed free tier in 2022
- - More expensive than competitors for equivalent resources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.