PocketBase vs Tigris
A detailed comparison to help you choose between PocketBase and Tigris.
PocketBase Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs | Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (188 reviews) | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Solo developers and small teams building web/mobile apps who want self-hosted backend simplicity without Firebase costs or vendor dependencies. | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit PocketBase → | Visit Tigris → | |
PocketBase
Pros
- + Deploy as single executable with zero external dependencies
- + Generate REST and real-time APIs automatically from database schema
- + Manage data and users through built-in admin dashboard
- + Self-hosted and open-source—full control over data and infrastructure
Cons
- - SQLite backend limits horizontal scaling for high-concurrency applications
- - Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Firebase or Supabase
- - Self-hosting requires basic DevOps knowledge for production deployments
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.