AWS WAF vs Radware
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Radware.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
4.7/5
Radware
217 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.7). AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield. Radware delivers DDoS mitigation, WAF, and bot management for enterprises. Protects web applications and infrastructure from volumetric attacks, Layer 7 exploits, and malicious automation at scale.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Radware Enterprise DDoS protection and application security platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 4.7 (217 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €2000/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Large enterprises and service providers defending critical applications against sophisticated DDoS attacks and web-layer threats. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam features |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Radware → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Radware
Pros
- + Handle massive volumetric attacks with multi-terabit/sec capacity
- + Integrate WAF and bot management without separate tools
- + Deploy on-premise, cloud, or hybrid for flexibility
- + Automate threat detection and mitigation responses
Cons
- - Higher cost for enterprise-grade DDoS capacity
- - Complex configuration and tuning for optimal performance
- - Requires dedicated security team for full platform utilization
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.