AWS WAF vs Path.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Path.net.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 3.6). AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield. Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (278 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €300/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Path.net → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.