AWS WAF vs Imperva
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Imperva.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Imperva Enterprise WAF and DDoS protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 4.0 (66 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €500/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Enterprise companies in financial services needing best-in-class WAF and bot management |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam featuressso |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Imperva → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Imperva
Pros
- + Enterprise-grade WAF with bot management
- + 6Tbps DDoS capacity
- + Advanced API security
Cons
- - Very expensive — enterprise pricing only
- - Complex to configure for maximum protection
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.