Path.net vs Radware
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Radware.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
4.7/5
Radware
217 reviews
Radware is rated higher (4.7 vs 3.6). Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation. Radware delivers DDoS mitigation, WAF, and bot management for enterprises. Protects web applications and infrastructure from volumetric attacks, Layer 7 exploits, and malicious automation at scale.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Radware Enterprise DDoS protection and application security platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.7 (217 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €300/mo✓ | From €2000/mo |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Large enterprises and service providers defending critical applications against sophisticated DDoS attacks and web-layer threats. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam features |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Radware → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Radware
Pros
- + Handle massive volumetric attacks with multi-terabit/sec capacity
- + Integrate WAF and bot management without separate tools
- + Deploy on-premise, cloud, or hybrid for flexibility
- + Automate threat detection and mitigation responses
Cons
- - Higher cost for enterprise-grade DDoS capacity
- - Complex configuration and tuning for optimal performance
- - Requires dedicated security team for full platform utilization
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.