Path.net vs Radware
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Radware.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Radware Behavioral DDoS mitigation with machine learning | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.7 (217 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €300/mo✓ | From €2000/mo |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Enterprises with complex attack scenarios needing machine learning-based behavioral DDoS detection |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam features |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Radware → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Radware
Pros
- + ML-based behavioral detection
- + Hybrid on-prem + cloud mitigation
- + 24/7 SOC service
Cons
- - Very expensive enterprise product
- - Complex deployment
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.