Path.net vs Imperva
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Imperva.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Imperva Enterprise WAF and DDoS protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.0 (66 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €300/mo✓ | From €500/mo |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Enterprise companies in financial services needing best-in-class WAF and bot management |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam featuressso |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Imperva → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Imperva
Pros
- + Enterprise-grade WAF with bot management
- + 6Tbps DDoS capacity
- + Advanced API security
Cons
- - Very expensive — enterprise pricing only
- - Complex to configure for maximum protection
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.