Path.net vs Hetzner DDoS Protection
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Hetzner DDoS Protection.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Hetzner DDoS Protection Hardware-backed DDoS mitigation for high-traffic infrastructure | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.9 (245 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From €300/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Organizations running high-traffic applications on Hetzner infrastructure who need native, straightforward DDoS mitigation without multi-vendor complexity. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenter |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Hetzner DDoS Protection → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Hetzner DDoS Protection
Pros
- + Deploy without external vendor lock-in or third-party dependencies
- + Handle multi-gigabit attacks via Hetzner's own infrastructure
- + Activate automatically or manually via API and console
- + Protect both Cloud and bare-metal servers in one service
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner infrastructure; cannot protect non-Hetzner targets
- - Requires understanding of traffic baseline for effective tuning
- - Fewer advanced customization options versus specialized DDoS providers
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.