Netlify vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Netlify and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Netlify
519 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Netlify is rated higher (4.8 vs 4.5). Git-connected hosting platform for static sites and serverless functions. Automatically builds and deploys on every push with built-in CDN, SSL, and preview deployments. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Netlify Deploy modern web apps with zero config, automated CI/CD included | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (519 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (372 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Frontend teams and JAMstack projects that prioritize deployment speed and automation over deep infrastructure control. | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99% | — |
| Data-center count | 50 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global — AWS/Cloudflare edge | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Netlify → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Netlify
Pros
- + Deploy directly from Git with zero manual steps
- + Generate preview URLs for every pull request automatically
- + Built-in CDN and SSL certificates included
- + Run serverless functions without managing infrastructure
- + Instant rollbacks to previous deployments
Cons
- - Build minutes limited on free tier; overages can add cost quickly
- - Dependency on Netlify's build system reduces customization for complex workflows
- - Cold starts on functions can impact performance for latency-sensitive apps
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.