Napkin vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Napkin and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.5/5
Napkin
230 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Supabase Functions is rated higher (4.5 vs 4.5). Napkin lets you write and run JavaScript serverless functions directly in the browser with zero setup. Instant HTTP endpoints for webhooks, bots, and quick integrations. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Napkin Run JavaScript functions from a browser editor | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (230 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers needing quick serverless functions for prototypes, webhooks, and bots without any setup | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tier | free tierapi access |
| Visit Napkin → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Napkin
Pros
- + Zero setup — browser-based function editor
- + Instant HTTP endpoints
- + Good for quick prototyping
Cons
- - Not for production-critical applications
- - JavaScript only
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.