Napkin vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Napkin and Supabase Functions.
Napkin Run JavaScript functions from a browser editor | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (230 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers needing quick serverless functions for prototypes, webhooks, and bots without any setup | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tier | free tierapi access |
| Visit Napkin → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Napkin
Pros
- + Zero setup — browser-based function editor
- + Instant HTTP endpoints
- + Good for quick prototyping
Cons
- - Not for production-critical applications
- - JavaScript only
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.