MySQL HeatWave (Oracle) vs PlanetScale Vitess
A detailed comparison to help you choose between MySQL HeatWave (Oracle) and PlanetScale Vitess.
MySQL HeatWave (Oracle) MySQL with in-memory analytics — free 30-day trial | PlanetScale Vitess MySQL-compatible serverless — Vitess under the hood | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (404 reviews) | 4.8 (205 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | MySQL teams who need analytics on transactional data without building separate data pipelines | Database engineers wanting to understand or self-host the Vitess technology underlying PlanetScale |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit MySQL HeatWave (Oracle) → | Visit PlanetScale Vitess → | |
MySQL HeatWave (Oracle)
Pros
- + MySQL + analytics in one engine — no ETL
- + Runs on AWS and Azure too
- + Free 30-day trial
Cons
- - Oracle ecosystem complexity
- - Pricing opaque for large workloads
PlanetScale Vitess
Pros
- + Open-source Vitess powering PlanetScale
- + YouTube-scale tested
- + Horizontal sharding for MySQL
Cons
- - Complex to self-host
- - No foreign key support in Vitess
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.