Inngest vs Trigger.dev
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Inngest and Trigger.dev.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
Inngest
360 reviews
4.3/5
Trigger.dev
377 reviews
Inngest is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.3). Inngest is a developer platform for building reliable event-driven background functions. Automatic retries, delays, fan-out, and step functions. Works with Next.js, Node.js, Go, and Python. Trigger.dev is an open-source background job and workflow platform for TypeScript developers. Run long tasks, cron jobs, and event-driven workflows. Self-hostable or cloud.
Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (360 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (377 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Full-stack developers adding reliable background jobs and event-driven workflows to their Next.js or Node apps | TypeScript developers building background jobs, scheduled tasks, and event-driven workflows in Node.js apps |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Inngest → | Visit Trigger.dev → | |
Inngest
Pros
- + Zero infrastructure setup
- + Automatic retries with backoff
- + Works with any framework or language
Cons
- - Usage-based pricing at scale
- - Developer tool only
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + TypeScript-native with great DX
- + Open-source and self-hostable
- + Long-running task support (no timeout limits)
Cons
- - Developer tool — not for no-code users
- - Newer platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.