Inngest vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Inngest and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
Inngest
360 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Inngest is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.5). Inngest is a developer platform for building reliable event-driven background functions. Automatic retries, delays, fan-out, and step functions. Works with Next.js, Node.js, Go, and Python. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (360 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (372 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Full-stack developers adding reliable background jobs and event-driven workflows to their Next.js or Node apps | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Inngest → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Inngest
Pros
- + Zero infrastructure setup
- + Automatic retries with backoff
- + Works with any framework or language
Cons
- - Usage-based pricing at scale
- - Developer tool only
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.