Hetzner Storage Box vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hetzner Storage Box and rsync.net.
Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (47 reviews) | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €3/mo✓ | From €8/mo |
| Best for | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacentergdpr compliant | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.