Hasura Cloud vs Fauna
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hasura Cloud and Fauna.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
Hasura Cloud
129 reviews
3.8/5
Fauna
339 reviews
Hasura Cloud is rated higher (4.9 vs 3.8). Hasura auto-generates a real-time GraphQL API on your PostgreSQL or MySQL database in minutes. Authorization built-in, action/event support, and direct database connection. Connect your own Postgres or use Neon. Fauna is a serverless document database with ACID transactions, native GraphQL API, and global replication. No servers to manage. Unique multi-tenancy model. Ideal for Jamstack and serverless apps.
Hasura Cloud Instant GraphQL API on any Postgres database | Fauna Serverless document database with ACID transactions | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (129 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (339 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers who want to instantly expose their PostgreSQL database as a GraphQL API | Jamstack developers who need a serverless database with GraphQL API and automatic global replication |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Hasura Cloud → | Visit Fauna → | |
Hasura Cloud
Pros
- + Instant GraphQL from existing database
- + Real-time subscriptions built-in
- + Authorization rules in the API layer
Cons
- - GraphQL expertise helpful
- - Hasura-specific concepts to learn
Fauna
Pros
- + Serverless — no scaling needed
- + GraphQL API native
- + ACID transactions across global regions
Cons
- - Proprietary FQL query language
- - Pricing can surprise at scale
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.