Google Cloud Functions vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Cloud Functions and Supabase Functions.
Google Cloud Functions Serverless functions on Google infrastructure | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (281 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP and Firebase developers needing serverless functions tightly integrated with Google services | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Google Cloud Functions → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Google Cloud Functions
Pros
- + 2M free invocations/month
- + Firebase integration excellent
- + Multiple language runtimes
Cons
- - GCP complexity for beginners
- - Cold starts on Gen 1
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.