Google Cloud Functions vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Cloud Functions and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Google Cloud Functions
281 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Supabase Functions is rated higher (4.5 vs 3.7). Google Cloud Functions is GCP's serverless compute. HTTP-triggered or event-driven. 2M free invocations/month. Node.js, Python, Go, Java, Ruby, PHP, and .NET supported. Deep integration with Firebase. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Google Cloud Functions Serverless functions on Google infrastructure | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (281 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP and Firebase developers needing serverless functions tightly integrated with Google services | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Google Cloud Functions → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Google Cloud Functions
Pros
- + 2M free invocations/month
- + Firebase integration excellent
- + Multiple language runtimes
Cons
- - GCP complexity for beginners
- - Cold starts on Gen 1
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.